On Mon, Mar 12, 2001 at 06:48:21PM -0500, Barry A. Warsaw wrote: > >>>>> "GvR" == Guido van Rossum <guido@digicool.com> writes: > GvR> Yes, that was on the list once but got dropped. You might > GvR> want to get together with Finn and Samuele to see what their > GvR> rules are. (They allow the use of some keywords at least as > GvR> keyword=expression arguments and as object.attribute names.) > I'm actually a little surprised that the "Jython vs. CPython" > differences page doesn't describe this (or am I missing it?): Nope, it's not in there. It should be under the Syntax heading. > http://www.jython.org/docs/differences.html Funnily enough: "Jython supports continue in a try clause. CPython should be fixed - but don't hold your breath." It should be updated for CPython 2.1 when it's released ? :-) [*snip* how Barry thinks he remembers how Jython might handle keywords] > It would eliminate much of the need for writing obfuscated code like > "class_" or "klass". Yup. That's one of the reasons I brought it up. (That, and Mark mentioned it's actually necessary for .NET Python to adhere to 'the spec'.) Holding-my-breath-ly y'rs, -- Thomas Wouters <thomas@xs4all.net> Hi! I'm a .signature virus! copy me into your .signature file to help me spread!
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4