On Mon, 12 Mar 2001, Paul Prescod <paulp@ActiveState.com> wrote:
> Whether or not Python adopts rationals as the default number type, a
> rational() built-in would be a Good Thing. I'd like to see it in 2.1 or
> 2.2.
OK, how about this:
1. I remove the "literals" part from my PEP to another PEP
2. I add to rational() an ability to take strings, such as "1.3" and
make rationals out of them
Does anyone have any objections to
a. doing that
b. the PEP that would result from 1+2
?
I even volunteer to code the first prototype.
--
"I'll be ex-DPL soon anyway so I'm |LUKE: Is Perl better than Python?
looking for someplace else to grab power."|YODA: No...no... no. Quicker,
-- Wichert Akkerman (on debian-private)| easier, more seductive.
For public key, finger moshez@debian.org |http://www.{python,debian,gnu}.org
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4