Neil> Some people say you should avoid PGCC since it generates buggy
Neil> code. I don't know if that's true or not.
If nothing else, PGCC almost certainly gets a lot less exercise than the
mainstream GCC code. Given the statement in the PGCC FAQ that typical
speedups are on the range of 5%:
http://www.goof.com/pcg/pgcc-faq.html#SEC0119
it doesn't seem like it would be worth the effort to use it in any critical
applications. Better to just wait for PGCC optimizations to trickle into
GCC itself.
Skip
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4