Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2001-July/016408.html below:

[Python-Dev] Changing the Division Operator -- PEP 238, rev 1.12

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] Changing the Division Operator -- PEP 238, rev 1.12
• Next message: [Python-Dev] Simulating shells (was Re: Changing the Division Operator -- PEP 238, rev 1.12)
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Michael Hudson wrote:
> 
>...
>     I propose adding a fourth, optional, "flags" argument to the
>     builtin "compile" function.  If this argument is omitted, there
>     will be no change in behaviour from that of Python 2.1.
>
>     If it is present it is expected to be an integer, representing
>     various possible compile time options as a bitfield.  

Nit: What is the virtue to using a C-style bitfield? The efficiency
isn't much of an issue. I'd prefer either keyword arguments or a list of
strings.
-- 
Take a recipe. Leave a recipe.  
Python Cookbook!  http://www.ActiveState.com/pythoncookbook

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] Changing the Division Operator -- PEP 238, rev 1.12
• Next message: [Python-Dev] Simulating shells (was Re: Changing the Division Operator -- PEP 238, rev 1.12)
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4