Michael McLay wrote:
>
> Absolutely. The PEP process is suppose to formalize the capture of
> ideas so they can be reference. This PEP is mostly orthogonal to
> Aahz's proposal. They can be merge, or we can reference each others
> PEP. I'm probably not the best choice for doing the implement of the
> decimal number semantics, so I'd be happy to work with Aahz.
Note that I am unwilling to discuss this in the context of any PEP
until/unless I finish my implementation. There is already a spec for
what I'm doing (Cowlishaw), and I see no point in talking until code is
ready for use. If someone wants to take over my work, I won't complain;
I've already done the easy work. ;-)
--
--- Aahz (@pobox.com)
Hugs and backrubs -- I break Rule 6 <*> http://www.rahul.net/aahz/
Androgynous poly kinky vanilla queer het Pythonista
I don't really mind a person having the last whine, but I do mind someone
else having the last self-righteous whine.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4