A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2001-July/016237.html below:

[Python-Dev] shouldn't we be considering all pending numeric proposals together?

[Python-Dev] shouldn't we be considering all pending numeric proposals together? [Python-Dev] shouldn't we be considering all pending numeric proposals together?Tim Peters tim.one@home.com
Wed, 25 Jul 2001 01:01:26 -0400
[MAL]
> May I suggest that these rather controversial changes be carried
> out on a separate branch of the Python source tree before adding
> them to the trunk ?!

Sure, provided you're volunteering to keep the branch in synch with the
trunk:  branches are both expensive and risky, unless the intent is never to
merge in either direction.

Much as I hate the obfuscating effects of #ifdefs, these changes are
localized enough that it would be a clear net win to use them rather than
branches, if Guido gets weary of maintaining a patch.




RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4