> I formed the impression that all of the UCS-4 and surrogate work was > for the goal of supporting ISO 10646 (or whatever the number is -- you > know, the 31-bit character set), so everything is written with that > assumption. Presumably that's wrong. Is ISO 10646 on the roadmap at > this point, or is it completely irrelevant? The impression I got from the discussion around this was that ISO 10464 now *also* promises to limit itself to 0x110000 characters forever. MvL or MAL can corroborate. --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4