Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2001-July/016080.html below:

[Python-Dev] 2.2a1 and Numerical

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] 2.2a1 and Numerical
• Next message: [Python-Dev] re with Unicode broken?
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

> Numerical Python 20.1 compiles and passes all its tests with 2.2a1.
> 
> It is about 10% slower than 2.1 both with and without optimization
> in executing the test suite. That test suite uses PyUnit and most of
> the operations involve small arrays so I suspect most of its time is
> in Python not the C code for Numeric.

Thanks for the report, Paul!

We'll definitely put performance on the agenda for 2.2; it's already
got our attention since Jim Fulton posted some Zope benchmarks in an
internal list at Digital Creations...

--Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] 2.2a1 and Numerical
• Next message: [Python-Dev] re with Unicode broken?
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4