tim wrote: > [Guido] > > Hm, then the directive would syntactically have to *precede* the > > docstring. That currently doesn't work -- the docstring may only be > > preceded by blank lines and comments. Lots of tools for processing > > docstrings already have this built into them. Is it worth breaking > > them so that editors can remain stupid? > > No. that's why the "directive" statement shouldn't be used as an encoding directive. (and since I don't see any other use for it, that's also why the "directive" statement doesn't belong in Python at all ;-) </F>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4