On Thu, Jul 12, 2001 at 11:33:13AM -0500, Skip Montanaro wrote: > Thomas> Both of these are distutils-build related, and I'm not sure on > Thomas> the 'right' fix on either. The latter also applies to 'bsddb', > Thomas> by the way, and is especially annoying to me, because I'm > Thomas> running Debian on more and more machines :) Does anyone who > Thomas> understands setup.py have time to look at these before a week > Thomas> from friday, when 2.1.1-final is scheduled ? > I just added another variant (with a patch): bsddb build on Mandrake 8.0 is > broken because it doesn't account for the libdb* shared library when > creating bsddb.so: > > https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=440725&group_id=5470&atid=105470 > Thomas, I'm not sure if this applies to your Debian build woes, but > perhaps it will help. Yes, it does! Now bsddb builds, but dbmmodule still doesn't. It seems that's because setup.py only checks for libndbm.so, and not for libdbX.so, which also have a DBM implementation (IIRC), or libgdbm.so, which has one too. -- Thomas Wouters <thomas@xs4all.net> Hi! I'm a .signature virus! copy me into your .signature file to help me spread!
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4