I'm in a hurry, so here's a short version of what I think: +1 on xmlrpclib.py in 2.2 +1 on a pure-python davlib.py in 2.2 (greg, please?) -0 on soap support in 2.2 (it's still a moving target; a new spec draft was released this weekend). if we want something now, it should be cayce ullman's SOAP.py, not my soaplib.py. but I don't think we need SOAP in the standard library for another year or two. (fwiw, my current thinking is that SOAP is a flawed idea, and that the need for SOAP will go away when people get better XML/Schema tools, but that's another story. and don't get me started on SOAP BDG...) Cheers /F
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4