greg wrote: > I agree. This can only be a stopgap measure. Ultimately the > Unicode type needs to be made smarter. PIL uses 8 bits per pixel to store bilevel images, and 32 bits per pixel to store 16- and 24-bit images. back in 1995, some people claimed that the image type had to be made smarter to be usable. these days, nobody ever notices... </F>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4