> > A combination of time.time(), process id and counter should > > work in all cases. Make sure you use a lock around the counter, > > though. > > Yes, but...this hack has to work in a multithreaded environment, > so process ID isn't good enough. And I don't want to keep a counter > around if I don't have to. Sorry Eric, this just doesn't make sense. Keeping a counter around in your module (protected by a semaphore) is obviously the right solution. Why are you fighting it? --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4