> Bottom line (IMHO), this is just something about email that is and > will forever remain broken. Given that, it was voted a long while > back to make Reply-To for checkins point to python-dev so until > there's a hue and cry to change it back, I'll leave it as is. And > yeah, it bites me sometimes too! It sounds like a hue and cry to change it to me! It looks like it's time for a BDFL Pronouncement. I pronounce: Given that: - we all know how to mail to python-dev; - replying to the sender is by far the most common kind of reply; - the mistake of replying to the sender when a reply-all was intended does much less potential harm than the mistake of replying to all when reply-to-sender was intended, the reply-to header shall be removed. --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4