Moshe Zadka wrote: > > I'm sorry! I meant to reply to tim alone, and ended up spamming python-dev! > Of course, the real culprit is the person who fixed up the reply-to in > the checkin messages to point to python-dev. Why was it done, and > isn't there a better way? This makes it painful to personally comment > on people's checkin messages. I suggest instead to add a mail-followup-to > header > > (Didn't anyone read "Reply-To Munging Considered Harmful"?) Naa, noone needs to be shot in the foot ;) In fact I like it, that replies go to python-dev ... after all, that's where these things should be discussed. BTW, in case you misunderstood my reply: it would indeed make sense to automate these kinds of check (tabnanny et al). -- Marc-Andre Lemburg ______________________________________________________________________ Company: http://www.egenix.com/ Consulting: http://www.lemburg.com/ Python Pages: http://www.lemburg.com/python/
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4