> yes. I suggest adding doctest.py plus one unit test implementation. I second this vote for doctest (in addition to a unittest thing). I propose that Tim checks in his latest version of doctest. It should go under Lib, not under Lib/test, I think. (Certainly that's how Tim has been proposing its use.) It requires LaTeX docs, but since it's got a great docstring, that should be easy. > > If so, I suggest you try writing some tests with each tool and > > reporting back with your feedback. > > we've recently migrated from a 30-minute reimplementation of Kent > Beck's original framework to one of the frameworks you mention. with > that background, the choice was easy. let me know when it's time to > vote... Which framework are you now using? --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4