> Hi.
>
> Sorry if everybody is already aware of this.
No, it's new to me.
> I have checked the code for pdb in CVS , especially for the p cmd,
> maybe I'm wrong but given actual the implementation of things that
> gives no access to the value of free or cell variables. Should that
> be fixed?
I think so. I've noted that the locals() function also doesn't see
cell variables:
from __future__ import nested_scopes
import pdb
def f():
a = 12
print locals()
def g(): print a
g()
a = 100
g()
#pdb.set_trace()
f()
This prints
{}
12
100
When I enable the pdb.set_trace() call, indeed the variable a is not
found.
> AFAIK pdb as it is works with jython too. So when fixing that, it would
> be nice if this would be preserved.
Yes!
--Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4