>>>>> "AMK" == Andrew Kuchling <akuchlin@cnri.reston.va.us> writes: AMK> On Wed, Feb 21, 2001 at 01:58:18PM +1100, Mark Hammond wrote: >> Assuming that people really _do_ want this feature, IMO the bar >> should be raised so there are _zero_ backward compatibility >> issues. AMK> Even at the cost of additional implementation complexity? At AMK> the cost of having to learn "scopes are nested, unless you do AMK> these two things in which case they're not"? AMK> Let's not waffle. If nested scopes are worth doing, they're AMK> worth breaking code. Either leave exec and from..import AMK> illegal, or back out nested scopes, or think of some better AMK> solution, but let's not introduce complicated backward AMK> compatibility hacks. Well said. Jeremy
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4