>>>>> "FL" == Fredrik Lundh <fredrik@effbot.org> writes: >> Another issue is documentation. I don't know how much >> documentation doctest has, but PyUnit's documentation is *superb* >> and there are no suprises, which is absolutely +1. FL> No surprises? I don't know -- my brain kind of switched off FL> when I came to the "passing method names as strings to the FL> constructor" part. Now, how Pythonic is that on a scale? I think this is one of the issues where there is widespread argeement that a feature is needed. The constructor should assume, in the absence of some other instruction, that any method name that starts with 'test' should be considered a test method. That's about as Pythonic as it gets. Jeremy
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4