tim wrote: > I will immodestly claim that if doctest is sufficient for your testing > purposes, you're never going to find anything easier or faster or more > natural to use you know, just having taken another look at doctest and the unit test options, I'm tempted to agree. except for the "if sufficient" part, that is -- given that you can easily run doctest on a test harness instead of the original module, it's *always* sufficient. (cannot allow tim to be 100% correct every time ;-) Cheers /F
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4