Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2001-February/012437.html below:

[Python-Dev] any opinion on 'make quicktest'?

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] any opinion on 'make quicktest'?
• Next message: [Python-Dev] any opinion on 'make quicktest'?
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Jeremy Hylton writes:
 > I run the regression test a lot.  I have found that it is often useful
 > to exclude some of the slowest tests for most of the test runs and

  I think this would be nice.

 > + QUICKTESTOPTS=	$(TESTOPTS) -x test_thread test_signal test_strftime \
 > + 		test_unicodedata test_re test_sre test_select test_poll
 > + quicktest:	all platform
 > + 		-rm -f $(srcdir)/Lib/test/*.py[co]
 > + 		-PYTHONPATH= $(TESTPYTHON) $(TESTPROG) $(QUICKTESTOPTS)
 > + 		PYTHONPATH= $(TESTPYTHON) $(TESTPROG) $(QUICKTESTOPTS)

  In fact, for this, I'd only run the test once and would skip the
"rm" command as well.  I usually just run the regression test once
(but with all modules, to avoid the extra typing).


  -Fred

-- 
Fred L. Drake, Jr.  <fdrake at acm.org>
PythonLabs at Digital Creations

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] any opinion on 'make quicktest'?
• Next message: [Python-Dev] any opinion on 'make quicktest'?
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4