> -1 isn't mentioned at all. What does the final C99 say? Regardless, MS's > pre-C99 implementation says: [...] > So -1 sounds Linux-specific. Being a Unix old-timer, I cringe every time I see someone test for errors using "== -1". Except for anomalies like getpid() (which in the olden days could return any negative value except -1 as a legitimate pid), for the caller *any* negative value should be interpreted as an error, and tested for with "< 0". Never mind that most functions return -1. -1000 is just as much an error. Unhelpfully, --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4