Skip Montanaro writes: > That was the right thing to do under the circumstances, but I would if > there's some way to not allow anonymous bug reports and patches. It seems > almost impossible to actually get a response back to the submitter in such > cases, so I don't see how you can have a useful dialog about the > report/patch. Anonymous means the submitter was not logged in, but appearantly they have an option to leave an email address (which is not shown, which is fine). I don't think there's a requirement for an email address, though, and I don't see any way for us to determine if they left one. If there were a way to *require* an email address, or at least determine if there was one, I'd be satisfied. Not allowing anonymous reports at all would not be very good; many of them have proved useful (it doesn't matter who reports a typo in the docs, just that it gets assigned to me). -Fred -- Fred L. Drake, Jr. <fdrake at acm.org> PythonLabs at Zope Corporation
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4