>>>>> "TP" == Tim Peters <tim.one@home.com> writes: >> ... In related news, the material on nested scopes in the >> appendix of the refman should be moved out of the appendix. >> Someone who's not typing down a modem can do that. TP> I'm trusting that somebody else understood what that part meant. They did, so you can ignore this message. I added the appendix, after first trying to revise the ref manual. (This was before nested scopes became optional for 2.1.) I'll try to dig up my original effort, regardless I think I am on the hook to fix the ref manual to explain scope rules clearly. Jeremy
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4