David Goodger wrote: > > >From the PyChecker AST discussion, it seems we may have a common goal. For It seems that way. > the Docstring Processing System, I am looking into gleaning information from > the abstract syntax tree. From the working notes, under "Docstring > Extractor": > > We need code that scans a parsed Python module, and returns an > ordered tree containing the names, docstrings (including > additional docstrings), and additional info (in parentheses below) > of all of the following objects: > - methods (+ formal parameters) > - functions (+ formal parameters) Would you also want default parameter values? PyChecker needs all of that, plus additional info. So there is a lot of overlap. > I'd be very interested in pooling efforts to make this easier. I know almost > nothing about ASTs now, but that could change in a hurry :-). Pooling efforts would be good. I also don't know anything about the ASTs/compiler, but am willing to work on it. Neal
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4