RetroSearch Browse

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2001-August/016756.html below:

[Python-Dev] HAVE_HYPOT still needed?

[Python-Dev] HAVE_HYPOT still needed? [Python-Dev] HAVE_HYPOT still needed?Jack Jansen jack@oratrix.nl
Tue, 07 Aug 2001 17:34:04 +0200

Previous message: [Python-Dev] PEP 252: class methods
Next message: [Python-Dev] HAVE_HYPOT still needed?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

As I was removing outdated #ifdefs my eye fell on HAVE_HYPOT, and I have this 
very vague recollection that some old 68K Macs were the only system where 
hypot() wasn't in the C library. Does anyone know this for sure? If so we 
could remove the whole hypot() stuff...
--
Jack Jansen             | ++++ stop the execution of Mumia Abu-Jamal ++++
Jack.Jansen@oratrix.com | ++++ if you agree copy these lines to your sig ++++
www.oratrix.nl/~jack    | ++++ see http://www.xs4all.nl/~tank/ ++++

Previous message: [Python-Dev] PEP 252: class methods
Next message: [Python-Dev] HAVE_HYPOT still needed?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4