oops. mailer problem; here's the rest of the mail: > I have a 500k "negative patch" sitting on my machine which removes > most of unicodectype.c, replacing it with a small data table (based on > the same unidb work as yesterdays unicodedatabase patch). (this shaves another another 400-500k off the source distribution, and 10-20k in the binaries...) I've verified that all ctype-related methods eturn the same result as before the patch, for all characters in the unicode set (see the attached script). should I check it in? </F>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4