> >>> i = -2147483648 > OverflowError: integer literal too large > >>> i = -2147483648L > >>> int(i) # it *is* a valid integer literal > -2147483648 I struck this years ago! At the time, the answer was "yes, its an implementation flaw thats not worth fixing". Interestingly, it _does_ work as a hex literal: >>> 0x80000000 -2147483648 >>> -2147483648 Traceback (OverflowError: integer literal too large >>> Mark.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4