[Just] > You're going to have a hard time explaining that "\377" != u"\377". I agree. You are an example of how hard it is to explain: you still don't understand that for a person using CJK encodings this is in fact the truth. > Again, if you define that "all strings are unicode" and that 8-bit strings > contain Unicode characters up to 255, you're all set. Clear semantics, few > surprises, simple implementation, etc. etc. But not all 8-bit strings occurring in programs are Unicode. Ask Moshe. --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4