> Well, I can't check it in, so assigning it back to me would be fairly > pointless. Someone should also chime in on the Tools/perfecthash stuff as > well. If we want to keep it, I'll see if I can come up with an example > using Python's tokens since the data set is way smaller. :) I've learned from the sad NumPy experience that it's really bad to generate code and then throw away the generator and start editing the generated code... So please keep the generator up-to-date! --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.pythonlabs.com/~guido/)
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4