Thomas Wouters <thomas@xs4all.net>: > I'd personally like to hear some votes/opinions on the range literal patch, > but it seems to me there are others that only require some voting and second > opinions: I just posted a detailed response on that. > - Add 'isatty(fd)' to posixmodule. > Do Macs and Windows machines have an isatty() function that makes sense to > include ? Unknown to me. I'm +1 on adding this anyway. > - Better error message with UnboundLocalError > Patch looks okay to me, and Tim already said he liked the idea. +0. > - arraymodule: adding count, extend, index, pop, remove > I believe there was some discussion about this before, don't know the > outcome. Is there a PEP? I suspect from looking at the names that I would be +0 on this, but I wonder why pop() and no push()? > - new EXTENDED_ARG opcode, elimiate 16-bit oparg limit > Probably needs Guido and/or Tim decreeing whether the change is worth it > > - safe version of PyErr_Format > +0 on that, but what do I know. Don't know if it's actually safe ;) > > - Optional pad character for rjust, ljust > Definately +1, but I have a nagging feeling there is a better way to do it: > Why wasn't this implemented before ? What are people using instead of > string.rjust(string, padchar) ? No opinion on these. -- <a href="http://www.tuxedo.org/~esr">Eric S. Raymond</a> He that would make his own liberty secure must guard even his enemy from oppression: for if he violates this duty, he establishes a precedent that will reach unto himself. -- Thomas Paine
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4