A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2000-February/002331.html below:

[Python-Dev] Re: Python-checkins digest, Vol 1 #370

[Python-Dev] Re: Python-checkins digest, Vol 1 #370 - 8 msgsGuido van Rossum guido@python.org
Mon, 28 Feb 2000 09:47:53 -0500
> > *** INCOMPATIBLE CHANGE: This changes append(), remove(), index(), and
> > *** count() to require exactly one argument -- previously, multiple
> > *** arguments were silently assumed to be a tuple.
> 
> Not sure about remove(), index() and count(), but the change
> to .append() will break *lots* of code !

Agreed.  But 1.6 is as good a point to break it as any -- what's the
point in putting this off?  This isn't big enough to wait for 2.0.  I
could've done it in the 1.5.x series, but decided not to.

--Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)



RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4