On Fri, 18 Feb 2000, Fredrik Lundh wrote: > [Greg] > > One argument (of course) is stability. I don't see that as a problem in > > the case of moving modules. > > > > Personally, I'm okay with a partial move. I don't think that we'll be able > > to find proper packaging for everything. Let's shift the modules, review > > what's left, shift some more, etc. Lather/rinse/repeat. > > you obviously don't plan to write Python books in > the foreseeable future :-) hehe... The examples in the book will continue to work. But we'll just be doing it in A Better Way from now on :-) And no... I'm not going to write any books... (despite numerous inquiries from publishers) Cheers, -g -- Greg Stein, http://www.lyra.org/
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4