Barry wrote: > JvR> So, making join() a builtin makes a whole lot of sense. Not > JvR> doing this because people sometimes use a local reference to > JvR> os.path.join seems awfully backward. > > I agree. Have we agreed on the semantics and signature of builtin > join() though? Is it just string.join() stuck in builtins? +1 (let's leave the __join__ slot and other super-generalized variants for 2.2) </F>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4