> I don't think that is a very safe bet. Python 2.0 missed the > Debian Potato boat. This may have had to do more with the unresolved GPL issues. I recently received a mail from Stallman indicating that an agreement with CNRI has been reached; they have agreed (in principle, at least) to specific changes to the CNRI license that will defuse the choice-of-law clause when it is combined with GPL-licensed code "in a non-separable way". A glitch here is that the BeOpen license probably has to be changed too, but I believe that that's all doable. > I have no idea when Woody is expected to be > released but I expect it may take longer than that if history is > any indication. And who or what is Woody? Feeling-left-out, --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4