I'm maybe about three quarters on the way with writing PEP 230 -- far enough along to be asking for comments. Get it from CVS or go to: http://python.sourceforge.net/peps/pep-0230.html A prototype implementation in Python is included in the PEP; I think this shows that the implementation is not too complex (Paul Prescod's fear about my proposal). This is pretty close to what I proposed earlier (Nov 5), except that I have added warning category classes (inspired by Paul's proposal). This class also serves as the exception to be raised when warnings are turned into exceptions. Do I need to include a discussion of Paul's counter-proposal and why I rejected it? --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4