Guido van Rossum writes: > Alas, it could never work. Look at this: > > for i in a:b:c > > Does it mean > > for i in (a:b) : c > > or > > for i in a: (b:c) Of course, it means "for i in the range from a to b-1 with stride c", but as written it's illegal because you'd need another `:' after the c. <wink> > I'm postponing this discussion until after Python 2.0 final is > released -- the feature freeze is real! Absolutely. I won't bring this up again, until the approprate time.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4