skip wrote:
> Don't know if this should concern us in preparation for 2.0b1 release, but
> the following came across c.l.py this morning.
http://sourceforge.net/bugs/?func=detailbug&bug_id=110601&group_id=5470
"The problem you describe is an artifact of the way mxDateTime
tries to reuse the time.time() API available through the
standard Python time module"
> Essentially, this is a major problem in either the Python internals, or
> in PyApache.
ah, the art of debugging...
</F>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4