> How about a:b to indicate the range starting at a and ending with b-1? I believe this is what the Nummies originally suggested. > which doesn't look so bad to me, but is probably ambiguous. Hmmm, > could this possibly work or is it too much of a collision with the use > of `:' to indicate block structure? Alas, it could never work. Look at this: for i in a:b:c Does it mean for i in (a:b) : c or for i in a: (b:c) ? So we're back to requiring *some* form of parentheses. I'm postponing this discussion until after Python 2.0 final is released -- the feature freeze is real! --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.pythonlabs.com/~guido/)
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4