One of the original arguments for range literals as I recall was that indexing of loops could get more efficient. The compiler would know that [0:100:2] represents a series of integers and could conceivably generate more efficient loop indexing code (and so could Python2C and other compilers that generated C code). This argument doesn't seem to be showing up here at all. Does it carry no weight in the face of the relative inscrutability of the syntax? Skip
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4