On Tue, Aug 29, 2000 at 09:46:23AM -0500, Skip Montanaro wrote: > Which was why I proposed "...". It's sort of like "..", but has the > advantage of already being a recognized token. I doubt there would be much > problem adding ".." as a token either. "..." is not a token, it's three tokens: subscript: '.' '.' '.' | test | [test] ':' [test] [sliceop] So adding ".." should be no problem. -- Thomas Wouters <thomas@xs4all.net> Hi! I'm a .signature virus! copy me into your .signature file to help me spread!
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4