[Greg Ewing] > > meaning that Python > > 2.0 can be redistributed under the Python 2.0 license or under the > > GPL > > Are you sure that's possible? Doesn't the CNRI license > require that its terms be passed on to users of derivative > works? If so, a user of Python 2.0 couldn't just remove the > CNRI license and replace it with the GPL. I don't know the answer to this, but Bob Weiner, BeOpen's CTO, claims that according to BeOpen's lawyer this is okay. I'll ask him about it. I'll post his answer (when I get it) on the license-py20 list. I encourage to subscribe and repost this question there for the archives! (There were some early glitches with the list address, but they have been fixed.) --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.pythonlabs.com/~guido/)
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4