On Fri, Aug 25, 2000 at 04:11:31AM -0700, Thomas Wouters wrote: > ! [XXX so I am accepting this, but I'm a bit worried about the > ! argument coercion. For x+=y, if x supports augmented assignment, > ! y should only be cast to x's type, not the other way around!] Oh, note that I chose not to do *any* coercion, if x supports the in-place operation. I'm not sure how valuable coercion would be, here, at least not in its current form. (Isn't coercion mostly used by integer types ? And aren't they immutable ? If an in-place method wants to have its argument coerced, it should do so itself, just like with direct method calls.) -- Thomas Wouters <thomas@xs4all.net> Hi! I'm a .signature virus! copy me into your .signature file to help me spread!
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4