On Fri, Aug 25, 2000 at 07:29:53AM +0200, Thomas Wouters wrote: > On Fri, Aug 25, 2000 at 03:16:56PM +1000, Mark Hammond wrote: > > FATAL: node type 305, required 311 > > Is this pointing to a deeper problem, or is the assertion incorrect? > > At first sight, I would say "yes, the assertion is wrong". That doesn't mean > it shouldn't be fixed ! It's probably caused by augmented assignment or list > comprehensions, Actually, it was a combination of removing UNPACK_LIST and adding list comprehensions. I just checked in a fix for this. Can you confirm that this fixes it for the windows build, too ? -- Thomas Wouters <thomas@xs4all.net> Hi! I'm a .signature virus! copy me into your .signature file to help me spread!
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4