On Thu, Aug 24, 2000 at 09:00:56AM -0500, Guido van Rossum wrote: > > I just hope that with all these new operators you haven't > > closed the door for switching to argument based handling of > > coercion. > Far from it! Actually, the inplace operators won't do any coercions > when the left argument supports the inplace version, and otherwise > exactly the same rules apply as for the non-inplace version. (I > believe this isn't in the patch yet, but it will be when Thomas checks > it in.) Exactly. (Actually, I'm again re-working the patch: If I do it the way I intended to, you'd sometimes get the 'non in-place' error messages, instead of the in-place ones. But the result will be the same.) -- Thomas Wouters <thomas@xs4all.net> Hi! I'm a .signature virus! copy me into your .signature file to help me spread!
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4