>>>>> "M" == M <mal@lemburg.com> writes:
M> Does this mean I can still splip in that minor patch to allow
M> for attribute doc-strings in 2.0b1 provided I write up a short
M> PEP really fast ;-) ?
Well, it's really the 2.0 release manager's job to disappoint you, so
I won't. :) But yes a PEP would probably be required. However, after
our group meeting yesterday, I'm changing the requirements for PEP
number assignment. You need to send me a rough draft, not just an
abstract (there's too many incomplete PEPs already).
M> BTW, what the new standard on releasing ideas to dev public ?
M> I know I'll have to write a PEP, but where should I put the
M> patch ? Into the SF patch manager or on a separate page on the
M> Internet ?
Better to put the patches on SF.
-Barry
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4