M.-A. Lemburg writes: > Does this mean I can still splip in that minor patch to allow > for attribute doc-strings in 2.0b1 provided I write up a short > PEP really fast ;-) ? Write a PEP if you like; I think I'd really like to look at this before you change any code, and I've not had a chance to read your messages about this yet. This is *awefully* late to be making a change that hasn't been substantially hashed out and reviewed, and I'm under the impression that this is pretty new (the past week or so). > BTW, what the new standard on releasing ideas to dev public ? > I know I'll have to write a PEP, but where should I put the > patch ? Into the SF patch manager or on a separate page on the > Internet ? Patches should still go to the SF patch manager. -Fred -- Fred L. Drake, Jr. <fdrake at beopen.com> BeOpen PythonLabs Team Member
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4