On Mon, Aug 21, 2000 at 12:43:47PM +0200, Fredrik Lundh wrote: > mal wrote: > > How about a third variant: > > > > #3: > > __iter = <object>.iterator() > > while __iter: > > <variable> = __iter.next() > > <block> > how does that one terminate? __iter should evaluate to false once it's "empty". -- Thomas Wouters <thomas@xs4all.net> Hi! I'm a .signature virus! copy me into your .signature file to help me spread!
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4