> Well, it's the same argument as always: better have one format > which fits all than a new format for every application. XML > suits these tasks nicely and is becoming more and more accepted > these days. I believe this is a deluding claim. First, XML is not *one* format; is is rather a "meta format"; you still need the document type definition (valid vs. well-formed). Furthermore, the XML argument is good if there is no established data format for some application. If there is already an accepted format, I see no value in converting that to XML. Regards, Martin
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4