On Sun, Aug 20, 2000 at 11:22:28AM +0200, Sjoerd Mullender wrote: > I'd say, go back to the old situation, possibly with a simple Makefile > rule added so that you *can* build graminit, but one that is not used > automatically. That *is* the old situation. The rule of making graminit as a matter of course was for convenience with patches that change grammar. Now that most have been checked in, and we've seen what havoc and confusion making graminit automatically can cause, I'm all for going back to that too ;) -- Thomas Wouters <thomas@xs4all.net> Hi! I'm a .signature virus! copy me into your .signature file to help me spread!
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4